Glory NOTE 8, Millet Max are the two giant mobile phones that are rare in this year's new domestic mobile phone products. The similarity in the appearance of the two can not help but suspect that they come from a model. The price of the two is around 2,000 yuan, millet Max is lower, glory NOTE 8 is high, the high price of the honor NOTE 8 is equipped with a 13 million-pixel optical image stabilization lens (IMX278), and millet Max is 16 million pixels (probably red rice Note 3 full Netcom version that S5K3P3). Due to the positioning problem of large-screen mobile phones, most of the large-screen mobile phones over 6.0 inches in the market do not have an excellent photo experience. As a benchmark comparison, we have joined Samsung's previous generation flagship Galaxy S6 edge to see the glory NOTE 8. What is the imaging level of Xiaomi Max?
Note: The maximum pixel ratio of the photos of Honor NOTE 8 and Xiaomi Max is 4:3, and the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge is 16:9. The lens focal lengths of Honor NOTE 8 and Xiaomi Max are similar, the wide-angle size is similar, and the Galaxy S6 edge is due to the frame ratio. Question, the horizontal view of the photo will be smaller than the other two.
Daytime
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
In this set of daytime proofs, Xiaomi Max’s white balance is slightly reddish, and the glory of NOTE 8 and the Galaxy S6 edge is normal. Resolving power is relatively close, and Maxim's sharpening will be stronger.
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
In the outdoor daytime proofs, though the glory NOTE 8 is only 13 million pixels, and the other two are 16 million pixels, their resolution performance is not much different, although the color of Xiaomi Max will be slightly different from the others. There are deviations, but there is not much difference, and it is completely acceptable. The rapid development of smart phones in recent years, the well-lit daytime photographing environment has not allowed them to open a clear imaging gap.
Night & Indoor
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
In this set of indoor scenes, the light is not dark, but the complex environment and light make the imaging of the three different. From the imaging results, Glory NOTE 8 performed the worst. The center of the proofs was excessively smeared and the edges were out of focus. It is worth noting that this is not a single case. The Honored NOTE 8 samples in this group were selected from 5, and the other four were selected. Zhang's performance is also almost the same. Millet Max's performance is also relatively poor, although better than the glory NOTE 8, but the smear and the sharpening of the font are not handled properly. The flat performance of the Galaxy S6 edge in the outdoor daytime scene test has played its strength. Whether white balance, smearing, sharpening, analysis, or noise control is a repressive advantage over the other two phones, it is Described as the difference between a rocket launcher and a millet plus rifle.
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
By the night proofs, the gap between the Galaxy S6 edge has further widened. In this group of extremely weak light and complex light plants, the imaging is affected by the center point light source. The white balance of the Glory NOTE 8 is too green, which may be due to point light sources and green plants. The formation of green floodlights caused. While Xiaomi Max’s white balance performance is normal, but there are too many noises. This is related to Xiaomi’s algorithm. In some scenes of Xiaomi 5, the noise is not enough. The official staff once stated that “this is to Keep the answer for more details. The Galaxy S6 edge is still showing the strength of the gap, specifically see the details of the restoration of the stone, green leaves, flood control and so on.
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
In this group of samples, millet Max's noise is still too much, and the glory of NOTE 8 is not bad, compared to other low-light proofs, its performance in this scene is closer to the benchmark Galaxy S6 edge.
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
Left: Glory NOTE 8 Medium: Millet Max Right: Galaxy S6 edge
At night and in indoor imaging, Xiaomi Max’s imaging is not as glorious as NOTE 8, far from Galaxy S6 edge. This kind of imaging quality is even better than that of the thousand Yuan machine, but IMX278 is used and optical image stabilization is added. Glory NOTE 8 is better, this is at least 1500~2000 yuan domestic smart phone camera level. Glory NOTE 8 can basically cope with normal night photographing under the control of noise. It does not respond to complex light and color, and Millet Max belongs to a bright class at night. The Galaxy S6 edge here is not rated as a benchmark.
Glory NOTE 8 and Xiaomi Max are rare screen-sized smartphones with a 6.0 inch or larger size this year. The photographs of the glory of the NOTE 8 are worthy of this price. On the contrary, the photographs of Xiaomi Max are basically better than the Qianyuan machines. Last year's camera benchmark, the Galaxy S6 edge, had a small gap in low-light imaging. Due to the relatively small number of people using the giant screen mobile phone, together with the cost of large screens and large batteries, their configuration is often not the flagship level, but the price is not low, so many large screen mobile phones will not carry the flagship SoC Neither will it have an excellent photo experience.