It has been a week since the last week that the millet bracelet 2 has been unpacked. Today, it is the actual experience of its own users for a week.
Let's talk about battery life. In general, life is still very good. From August 29th to today September 5th, use a week (usually raise the hand to see the time, nothing can be measured heart beat new things always use more). Electricity only fell from 56% to 34%. (There are plans to prove that oh) It seems that full use of 30 days should not be a problem.
In addition to this advantage, there is also a good screen display (you can't see when the sun is too direct), and it's easy to see time.
Now talk about the lack of (can be said to disappoint me)
Various assessments say that the sleepwalking during sleep monitoring (when bedtime records the number of steps --- should be caused by hand movements) has been corrected, but I feel that the correction is good, should only be adjusted for sensitivity, The consequence of this adjustment is to reduce the accuracy of sleep monitoring (as far as the two previous millets are concerned).
Why do you say that? One night more than 4 (caused by the circumstance of the biological clock), but it will fall asleep again. The next morning a look at the record, perfect to ignore this period of waking (before the use of the millet bracelet generation and light version will be recorded). Dreams are gone, but sleep records are also useless. Now it feels completely abandoned.
Please ignore the longest one on the left side of the picture. Before the work was very late, the sleep was recorded for ten hours by the millet bracelet. . Oh my God. .
Let's talk about the heart rate function. Now it is possible to initiate tests without the mobile phone app and tap the small disc directly. Point to heart rate function will automatically start the heart rate test. After the wristband was slightly shaken, the heart rate immediately appeared before the eyes. But this generation of heart rate tests is accurate. . . . Only hehehe. (Look at the picture, the heart rate measured more than 58~100, my heart rate is already faster, generally normal 80~90.)
The only good thing is that the result of the heart rate test initiated by the wristband will be synchronized to the app on the next bracelet data synchronization.
There is also a BUG that has not been repaired: the caller's ring vibrates sometimes and not at all. (And this generation's bracelet is too light, and mosquitoes are almost like)
To sum up, this generation of improvements has increased the band's own function (time display, can directly initiate the heart rate test, directly look at the number of steps, look at the power). However, the shrinkage in performance completely lost interest in the use of millet bracelet 2 for continued use.
Get ready to look forward to FITBTI FLEX 2 and FITBIT charge 2. If it is time to buy, continue to do out-of-box and evaluation.